WatchUSeek Watch Forums WatchUSeek Watch Forums text
Continue readingModern-day Military Omega “Unit Watches”
Seamaster & Speedmaster … hey even an Australian Unit:
See:
Omega Constellation pie pan 168.005 Red Flags?
I am hoping to purchase this 168.005. I cant see it in person and I wanted to make sure Im not missing anything. It would be my first Omega and Ive been searching for a good quality one for a while. Buyer is asking $3000
…
Continue readingFlightmaster
This was my father’s watch, I would like to know if I can get it working again. I’m able to wind it the hands move but, it doesn’t work. Any info on it would be a big help. Thank you
Continue readingHow often do you see ANY nice watch in the wild?
I think I must just hang out in the wrong places.
Granted, my post-retirement job is driving a dump truck, so I never see a nice watch being worn anywhere I go except what is on my own wrist.
Last night my amazingly beautiful wife and I attended her…
Continue readingFOIS CK2998-8 vs Original 1962 Speedmaster CK2998
So I own a 2024 first omega in space that I call the CK2998-8 as it's really a continuation of that reference.
I showed it to my Dad and he said he couldn't believe that's what watches looked like in 1962. He said looks very modern and…
Continue readingCWC G10
I am looking for some advice regarding an ex British army CWC G10 2006 watch.
I have four Omegas that I rotate as daily wearers but use the G10 for fishing.
The battery went recently and after replacing it ran for only about 20 minutes.
I ordered ne…
Continue readingChronometre cal 135
Hi Zenith afficionados,
I am mainly an Omega guy as you might know but as a hard core watch collector I know that a Zenith Chronometre with cal. 135 is a must have for any vintage watch collection.
I own a nice SS example with a 2 brand dial, Zenith p…
## WRUW on 07 August 2026? ##
Omega Constellation 168.017 Hands
Hello,
I am looking to replace my watch hands, I can't seem to find them on Ebay, maybe someone here can help me.
Omega
Constellation
168.017
Movement: 564
Thanks
Continue reading